For more than a year the following question has been discussed in the media, among politicians and within the military: is what is going on between Israel and the Palestinians a war, or is it just "fighting"? Early this morning, the question was answered: it is war indeed. The government of Israel has officially and formally branded the Palestinian National Authority and its president, Yasser Arafat, as the enemy and instructed the armed forces under its command actively and aggressively to pursue the war by air, land and sea.
This is not a random occurrence. In fact, it is the logical culmination of the policies undertaken by Ariel Sharon ever since he assumed power in February; and, in fact, these are a direct continuation of Sharon's policies as defence minister in the early 1980s, when he initiated a disastrous invasion of Lebanon for the purpose of destroying the Palestine Liberation Organization and expelling Arafat.
Since becoming prime minister, Sharon has been edging closer and closer to this all-out war. Measures of oppression were steadily piled on top of each other, yesterday's outrageous innovation becoming today's routine. The "strangling closure" imposed on Ramallah at the very first week of Sharon's tenure and which aroused then many international protests was, in fact, far less severe than the siege at present imposed on each every West Bank town and village.
And the same process of familiarization had gone on with regard to the bombing of Palestinian cities - first by helicopter gunships (as already started by Ehud Barak), then by F-16 fighter planes; and with the more and more widespread assassination of Palestinians suspected of terrorism; and with armed incursions into Palestinian-held areas - first for days, later for weeks, then months.
Mediation efforts and plans there had been in plenty throughout Sharon's term. The prime minister hardly ever rejected any of them openly. Rather, he used what so far seems a fool proof method: making a rigid demand for seven days of "complete and absolute ceasefire" before any substantive negotiations can take place, and then making a gross provocation, just before the newest ceasefire is about to go into force.
What happened a bit more than a week ago was a particularly effective use of the technique: a few days before the latest mediator, the former US general Zinni, Sharon authorized the assassination by helicopter gunships of Mahmud Abu Hunud, a Hamas leader prominent and popular enough to ensure that his death would be avenged in Hamas's brutal fashion - particularly since the assassination took place when Palestinian public opinion was already inflamed by the death of five Palestinian children from an explosive charge set up by Israeli army sappers (which was, apparently, an accident).
The ploy was, in fact, quite obvious. It was commented on in the media at the time; the knowledgeable Alex Fishman pointed in Yediot Ahranot (25 November) that the Abu Hunud assassination broke the tacit agreement between Arafat and Hamas not to carry out suicide bombings - an agreement which had been in force for several months and whose existence may well have saved dozens of Israeli lives.
Without access to Sharon's confidential records, there is no way of conclusively proving that the prime minister actually desired what followed. There is no doubt that he and his military and intelligence advisers knew full well what would result from assassinating Abu Hunud and, nevertheless, ordered the deed to be done. Nor can there be a doubt that Hamas's grisly revenge, causing the death of 26 randomly chosen Israelis, was of inestimable value to Sharon. It gave him the perfect pretext for the declaration of war upon Arafat, effectively scuttling the Zinni mission and letting the Pentagon hawks gain the upper hand over the State Department in the US administration's infighting. As a result, Sharon's onslaught on the Palestinians received unprecedented open backing from Washington.
With that kind of backing, Sharon could afford to adopt an openly contemptuous attitude to his foreign minister, Shimon Peres, whose international prestige as Nobel Peace Prize laureate and supposed peacemaker were hitherto vital to the Sharon government. Now, the prime minister could afford to ram his declaration of war through the cabinet and brush aside Peres's objections.
Sharon has been trumpeting his new campaign as "a war on terrorism". But how can anybody seriously claim that the cause of "fighting terrorism" can be furthered by bombing and destroying Yasser Arafat's personal helicopters, which anyway never could fly without the Israeli air force's approval? Or by sending tanks and bulldozers to wreck the runways of Gaza International Airport - the airport which was inaugurated three years ago by President Bill Clinton in person and which had been closed down ever since the outbreak of the Intifadah? Or by again invading Ramallah, a large portion of which was just recently occupied by Israeli tanks without in the least diminishing the intensity of the Palestinian rebellion? Or even less, by systematically targeting and destroying the installations of the Palestinian police and security services - the very apparatus with which Arafat had just begun the difficult and delicate task of confronting Palestinian militants.
Seen in the light of an Israeli prime minster who is determined to maintain Israeli occupation of and settlement in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, and to smother any emergent Palestinian statehood, Sharon's campaign of the last days makes all too much sense. In which case Sharon seems to be getting the Bush administration's support in destroying what Secretary of State Powell described, just two weeks ago, as the United States' vision for the region's future: a viable Palestine living in peace side by side with Israel.
|
Please help in this very difficult and dangerous situation by sending the following message (or a message in your own words) to US President George W. Bush and Secretary of State Colin Powell by fax and/or email: President George W. Bush, Secretary of State Colin Powell, Dear Sir In the aftermath of the suicide bombings in Jerusalem and Haifa, the US government has given Israeli Prime Minster Ariel Sharon a virtually free hand in conducting what amounts to an all-out war against the Palestinian National Authority. This support is given on the assumption that Mr Sharon is engaged in fighting terrorism, which has become a central aim of US policy since 11 September. However, the concrete military actions undertaken by Sharon raise doubts that that is his true aim - in particular, the targeting of Palestinian police stations and security service installations, weakening the very apparatus which the Palestinian National Authority needs to be able to confront Hamas. Rather, Sharon's actions suggest that his aim is to destroy the buds of Palestinian self-government, perpetuate Israeli occupation and settlement, and prevent the creation of a viable Palestinian state - aims which are in total contradiction to US policy, as reiterated in public very recently. Therefore, we call upon you to use your influence to help restrain Sharon's escalating attacks on the Palestinians, before they spin out of control and set the region ablaze. Sincerely ****** If you wish, you might like to add the following postscript: We would like to draw your attention to an Israeli public opinion poll published in the mass-circulation Yediot Ahranot on 3 December 2001. In spite of the fact that it was conducted a few hours after the Haifa bombing - a time when Israelis were extremely shocked and angry at the outrage - no less than 32 per cent of those asked were in favour of starting immediate and accelerated peace talks with the Palestinians, also without waiting for a cease fire. It would be worthwhile for the US Government, in its dealings with Israel, to take account of this substantial and often silenced part of Israeli society. |
*Adam Keller is spokesperson for the Israeli Peace Bloc Gush Shalom